Analysis of Public Information Disclosure: A Study on Improving Competency Development Training at the Bukittinggi Regional Human Resources Development Center of the Ministry of Home Affairs

Aurelia Valentin Edward; Nora Eka Putri; Lince Magriasti; Desri Nora

doi:10.37034/jems.v7i4.224

Authors

Aurelia Valentin Edward Universitas Negeri Padang
Nora Eka Putri Universitas Negeri Padang
Lince Magriasti Universitas Negeri Padang
Desri Nora Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37034/jems.v7i4.224

Keywords:

Public Information Disclosure, Competency Development, Civil Servants, Digital Technology, Training Management

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of public information disclosure in supporting competency development training for civil servants at PPSDM Regional Bukittinggi, Ministry of Home Affairs. Using a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study method, data were collected through in depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving structural officials, information management staff, and targeted civil servant participants. The findings reveal that the current dissemination of training information remains suboptimal, relying primarily on manual correspondence through BKPSDM offices. This approach results in slow delivery, limited reach, and unequal access among civil servants, compounded by the underutilization of digital platforms, absence of structured communication policies, and lack of dedicated public relations resources. However, existing regulatory support, the growing need for competency development, and the availability of digital infrastructure present significant opportunities for improvement. The study recommends the development of an integrated web-based information system, active use of social media for interactive engagement, and the institutionalization of public relations functions. These strategies are expected to enhance accessibility, participation, and public trust while serving as a replicable model for other multi regional training centers. The findings underscore the importance of shifting toward proactive, technology driven, and resource supported public information management to strengthen transparency and efficiency in civil servant competency development.

References

Mansoor, M. (2021). Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19. Government information quarterly, 38(4), 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101597

Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908

Khadafi, R., Nurmandi, A., Hasibuan, E. J., Harahap, M. S., Saputra, A., Mahardika, A., & Izharsyah, J. R. (2024). Assessing the Indonesian government's compliance with the public information disclosure law in the context of COVID-19 data transparency. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1339506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1339506

Saldanha, D. M. F., Dias, C. N., & Guillaumon, S. (2022). Transparency and accountability in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101680

Eom, S.-J., & Lee, J. (2022). Digital government transformation in turbulent times: Responses, challenges, and future direction. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690

Bernot, A., Tjondronegoro, D., Rifai, B., Hasan, R., Liew, A. W. C., Verhelst, T., & Tiwari, M. (2024). Institutional Dimensions in Open Government Data: A Deep Dive Into Indonesia’s Satu Data Initiative and Its Implications for Developing Countries. Public Performance & management review, 47(6), 1399-1429. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2377609

Meijer, A. (2013). Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public administration review, 73(3), 429-439.https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12032

Wirtz, B. W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open government: Origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. International journal of public administration, 38(5), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942735

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus048

Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American review of public administration, 37(3), 306-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006296777

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Paparini, S., Green, J., Papoutsi, C., Murdoch, J., Petticrew, M., Greenhalgh, T., ... & Shaw, S. (2020). Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges. BMC medicine, 18(1), 301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01777-6

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research Case Examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PloS one, 15(5), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076

Sahakyan, T. (2023). Member‐checking through diagrammatic elicitation: Constructing meaning with participants. Tesol Quarterly, 57(2), 686-701. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3210

Wang, Q., & Guan, Z. (2023). Can sunlight disperse mistrust? A meta-analysis of the effect of transparency on citizens’ trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(3), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac040

Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2020). Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101497

Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public administration review, 77(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685