Effectiveness of Regional Financial Management in the Regional Government and Autonomy Bureau of the Regional Secretariat of Sumatera Province

Saskia Pratiwi Danda; Asnil Asnil; Erianjoni Erianjoni; Syamsir Syamsir

doi:10.37034/jems.v8i1.273

Authors

Saskia Pratiwi Danda Universitas Negeri Padang
Asnil Asnil Universitas Negeri Padang
Erianjoni Erianjoni Universitas Negeri Padang
Syamsir Syamsir Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37034/jems.v8i1.273

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Regional Financial Management, Government Bureau, SWOT Analysis, Fiscal Governance

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of regional financial management within the Bureau of Government and Regional Autonomy of the Regional Secretariat of West Sumatera Province. The research aims to evaluate the bureau’s fiscal governance performance and identify strategic priorities through SWOT analysis. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. The analysis revealed that financial management practices have generally complied with existing regulations; however, several limitations persist, including fragmented coordination, low digital literacy, and uneven human resource capacity. Strengths lie in the presence of clear regulatory frameworks and committed leadership, while weaknesses are primarily related to outdated administrative processes. Opportunities arise from ongoing digital transformation initiatives and e-governance policies, whereas threats include rapid regulatory changes and economic instability. The findings suggest that strengthening digital readiness, leadership capability, and inter-departmental integration can significantly improve the bureau’s performance. This research contributes to the understanding of fiscal governance at the regional level and offers practical insights for policy reform and capacity development in decentralized public financial management systems.

References

Lewis, B. D. (2023). Indonesia’s new fiscal decentralisation law: A critical assessment. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 59(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2023.2180838

Salomo, R. V., & Rahmayanti, K. P. (2023). Progress and institutional challenges on local governments performance accountability system reform in Indonesia. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231196659. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231196659

Sofilda, E., Dinc, M., & Adom, P. K. (2023). Analysis of fiscal decentralisation, human development and regional growth in Indonesia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2220520. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2220520

Kis-Katos, K., & Sjahrir, B. S. (2017). The impact of fiscal and political decentralization on local public services in Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(2), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2017.03.003

Wiryawan, B. A., Pitradewi, R., & Fitrananda, A. (2022). The role of local government spending on industrial development in Indonesia. Journal of Economic Structures, 11(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-022-00262-y

Lewis, B. D. (2017). Local government spending and service delivery in Indonesia: The perverse effects of substantial fiscal resources. Regional Studies, 51(11), 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1216957

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Vidal-Bover, M. (2024). Unfunded mandates and the economic impact of decentralisation: When finance does not follow function. Political Studies, 72(3), 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221136666

Sjahrir, B. S., Kis-Katos, K., & Schulze, G. G. (2013). Political budget cycles in Indonesia at the district level. Economics Letters, 120(2), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.05.007

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency and accountability in government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001

Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.005

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Government at a Glance 2021. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en

Muhtar, M., Winarna, J., & Sutaryo, S. (2024). Local development in the emerging market: Does integrated government internal control matter? Journal of Governance & Regulation, 13(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv13i2siart7

Parrado, S., Van Ryzin, G. G., Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2013). Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.796260

Edo, S. (2025). Digital transformation and financial development in emerging economies: Regional variations and policy contingencies. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 3, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44265-025-00063-8

Zulfiqar, F. L., Silvia, T., & Abrori, A. (2024). Digital transformation and sustainable local tax system practices in emerging market: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Advances in Accounting, Economics, and Management, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47134/aaem.v2i2.510

Aquino, A. C. B. (2024). Accountability from the periphery to the centre of the local state. Local Government Studies, 50(6), 1129–1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2415683

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., Becker, M., & Müller, W. M. (2022). Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2381–2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00582-8

Benmohamed, N. (2024). Public value creation through the use of open government data in Australian public sector: A quantitative study from employees’ perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), Article 101930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101930