Pengaruh Environmental Responsibility dan Social Innovation terhadap Business Performance dengan Corporate Reputation sebagai Variabel Mediasi: Studi pada PT Olahkarsa Inovasi Indonesia

Authors

  • Peggy Rozzah Universitas Ciputra
  • Eric Harianto Universitas Ciputra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37034/jems.v8i4.502

Keywords:

Reputasi Perusahaan, Tanggung Jawab Lingkungan, Inovasi Sosial, Kinerja Bisnis, Olahkarsa

Abstract

Sustainability practices are increasingly assessed by their ability to generate business value, particularly in service-based organizations whose performance depends on credibility and stakeholder trust. In ESG consulting firms, environmental and social initiatives may not directly translate into business outcomes unless they strengthen how stakeholders perceive the organization. This study examines the influence of Environmental Responsibility and Social Innovation on Business Performance, with Corporate Reputation as a mediating variable, at PT Olahkarsa Inovasi Indonesia. A quantitative explanatory design was applied using a census approach involving all 82 employees of the company. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that Environmental Responsibility does not have a direct effect on Business Performance, but significantly improves Corporate Reputation. Social Innovation has a significant positive effect on both Corporate Reputation and Business Performance. Corporate Reputation also significantly affects Business Performance and mediates the relationships between Environmental Responsibility, Social Innovation, and Business Performance. These findings indicate that sustainability initiatives create business value when they are recognized by stakeholders as credible organizational commitments. For ESG consulting firms, reputation serves as a strategic mechanism that connects sustainability practices with business performance through trust, legitimacy, and perceived organizational reliability.

References

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. (2023). Global Sustainable Investment Review 2022. Global Sustainable Investment Alliance. Retrieved from https://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/GSIA-Report-2022.pdf

KPMG International. (2022). Big shifts, small steps: Survey of sustainability reporting 2022. KPMG International. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2022/10/ssr-small-steps-big-shifts.pdf

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 tentang penerapan keuangan berkelanjutan bagi lembaga jasa keuangan, emiten, dan perusahaan publik. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/sustainable-finance/id/peraturan/peraturan-ojk/Documents/SAL%20POJK%2051%20-%20keuangan%20berkelanjutan.pdf

PwC Indonesia. (2023). ESG in Indonesia: Access to finance 2023. PwC Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/id/en/esg/esg-in-indonesia-2023.pdf

Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549–2568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079

Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136200

Fombrun, C. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame & fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. FT Prentice Hall.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.

Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310390219

Velte, P. (2022). Meta-analyses on corporate social responsibility (CSR): A literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 72(3), 627–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00211-2

Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008

Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039

Maaloul, A., Zéghal, D., Ben Amar, W., & Mansour, S. (2023). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and disclosure on cost of debt: The mediating effect of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8

Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.820

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

Rozzah, P., & Harianto, E. (2026). Pengaruh Environmental Responsibility dan Social Innovation terhadap Business Performance dengan Corporate Reputation sebagai Variabel Mediasi: Studi pada PT Olahkarsa Inovasi Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Management Scienties, 8(4), 1367–1376. https://doi.org/10.37034/jems.v8i4.502